<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cycle Map &#8211; 6th December</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2007/12/06/cycle-map-6th-december/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2007/12/06/cycle-map-6th-december/</link>
	<description>Notes From A Strange Place</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:22:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2007/12/06/cycle-map-6th-december/comment-page-1/#comment-28335</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 12:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2007/12/06/cycle-map-6th-december/#comment-28335</guid>
		<description>Relations are optional - they are still a bit experimental, but the guys in the Netherlands are using them a fair bit. They are also the only &quot;clean&quot; way to tag if multiple routes share the same road, since with way tagging you can only have one reference number per street, whereas with a different relation for each route a given street can belong to each different relation.

I must confess to only using way-tagging so far - I haven&#039;t used JOSM for a while!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relations are optional &#8211; they are still a bit experimental, but the guys in the Netherlands are using them a fair bit. They are also the only &#8220;clean&#8221; way to tag if multiple routes share the same road, since with way tagging you can only have one reference number per street, whereas with a different relation for each route a given street can belong to each different relation.</p>
<p>I must confess to only using way-tagging so far &#8211; I haven&#8217;t used JOSM for a while!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Coulouris</title>
		<link>http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2007/12/06/cycle-map-6th-december/comment-page-1/#comment-28292</link>
		<dc:creator>George Coulouris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 18:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2007/12/06/cycle-map-6th-december/#comment-28292</guid>
		<description>I like the improved rendering too. One more minor point: making the pubs prominent is fine, but the markers tend to obscure other stuff at some zoom levels.

Main point of this post: Jean and I have completed lcn_ref tagging for LCN&#039;s 6 and 0 in Camden and Westminster and 14 in Islington (we&#039;ll update the wiki to show that).

I&#039;m now wondering whether we should be using relations, as described at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Routes . 

George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the improved rendering too. One more minor point: making the pubs prominent is fine, but the markers tend to obscure other stuff at some zoom levels.</p>
<p>Main point of this post: Jean and I have completed lcn_ref tagging for LCN&#8217;s 6 and 0 in Camden and Westminster and 14 in Islington (we&#8217;ll update the wiki to show that).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m now wondering whether we should be using relations, as described at <a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Routes" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Routes</a> . </p>
<p>George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2007/12/06/cycle-map-6th-december/comment-page-1/#comment-27893</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2007/12/06/cycle-map-6th-december/#comment-27893</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s great to see all of these new improvements making their way to the cycle map. Thanks for your continued efforts Andy!

In case anybody else is interested in adding a few mileposts as well, the tagging I&#039;ve been using is ncn_milepost = dudgeon &#124; mccoll &#124; mills &#124; rowe, where those are the surnames of their designers. In case you&#039;re not sure of the types, you can use the photos to match each type:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/dudgeontypemilepost
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/mccolltypemilepost
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/millstypemilepost
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/rowetypemilepost

I&#039;ll get round to producing a proper feature proposal on OSM at some point...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great to see all of these new improvements making their way to the cycle map. Thanks for your continued efforts Andy!</p>
<p>In case anybody else is interested in adding a few mileposts as well, the tagging I&#8217;ve been using is ncn_milepost = dudgeon | mccoll | mills | rowe, where those are the surnames of their designers. In case you&#8217;re not sure of the types, you can use the photos to match each type:<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/dudgeontypemilepost" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/dudgeontypemilepost</a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/mccolltypemilepost" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/mccolltypemilepost</a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/millstypemilepost" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/millstypemilepost</a><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/rowetypemilepost" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/rowetypemilepost</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll get round to producing a proper feature proposal on OSM at some point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2007/12/06/cycle-map-6th-december/comment-page-1/#comment-27786</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 18:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2007/12/06/cycle-map-6th-december/#comment-27786</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve still been intending to finish tagging LCN 24 (as it is in Carshalton), to date I&#039;ve seen it signed as NCN22, NCN20, NCN24 and LCN24.
I must get around to finding where it continues south to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve still been intending to finish tagging LCN 24 (as it is in Carshalton), to date I&#8217;ve seen it signed as NCN22, NCN20, NCN24 and LCN24.<br />
I must get around to finding where it continues south to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
