Slowly Catching On
I only occaisionally read articles about computer viruses (and trojans and so on), since in my experience avoiding viruses is a solved problem. Yet it’s nice to see general awarness about viruses increasing – especially in mainstream news.
Once again, another virus (it doesn’t really matter which) has used security flaws in Microsoft Programs and Operating Systems to do some damage. Whilst the BBC has always taken care to mention the word “Microsoft” when describing which systems are affected, today is the first time that I have seen them mentioning the alternatives –
The worms affect Windows systems but not Linux or Apple Mac computers.
– albeit as the last paragraph of their article. It’s a start, but when such a disclaimer comes as the second or third sentence (preferably with “As usual”, “Once again”, or “We’re not surprised to note that” in front, I’ll be happy.
Folks, computers aren’t vulnerable to computer viruses. Email programs aren’t vulnerable to Email viruses. However, Microsoft Windows (of all varieties) is vulnerable to Windows viruses, Microsoft Internet Explorer is vulnerable to Internet Explorer exploits, and Microsoft Outlook is vulnerable to Outlook viruses (propagated via email). Linux, Mozilla and any email client you can name (that’s not Outlook) are not vulnerable to any of the above viruses.
Sure, other alternatives might be vulnerable to viruses written specifically to target them. But until that starts happening on a large scales, that possibility is only used to try and divert attention from Microsoft’s failings.